This is a recipe from
PiHKAL. If you're interested in how the hardlinks
were chosen, read
noding PiHKAL for Everything2.
EDMA; 3,4-ETHYLENEDIOXY-N-METHYLAMPHETAMINE
SYNTHESIS: To a
solution of 27.6 g
protocatechualdehyde
(
3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde) in 250 mL
acetone there was added 57 g
finely powdered
anhydrous K2CO3 and 43 g
1,2-dibromoethane. The
mixture was held at reflux for 16 h, and then the
acetone removed by
evaporation. The remaining tar-like goo was distributed between equal
volumes of H2O and
CH2Cl2, and the
phases separated by centrifugation.
The organic
phase was washed with 2x50 mL 5%
NaOH, and the
solvent
removed under vacuum. The residue (22.0 g with the smell of the
starting
halide) was
distilled to give a fraction that boiled at 110
°C at 0.25 mm/
Hg to yield
3,4-ethylenedioxybenzaldehyde
(
1,4-benzodioxane-6-carboxaldehyde) as a white oil weighing 6.88 g.
This spontaneously
crystallized to give white solids that melted at
50-51 °C.
A
solution of 6.64 g
3,4-ethylenedioxybenzaldehyde in 40 mL
nitroethane was treated with 0.26 g
anhydrous ammonium acetate and
held at reflux for 3 days. TLC analysis showed that there was much
aldehyde remaining unreacted, so an additional 0.7 g
ammonium acetate
was added, and the mixture held at reflux for an additional 6 h. The
excess
nitroethane was removed under vacuum. The residue was
dissolved in 30 mL hot MeOH which, with patience and slow cooling,
finally
deposited a heavy yellow-gold powder. This product
1-(3,4-ethylenedioxyphenyl)-2-nitro-propene melted at 95-96 °C and
weighed 6.03 g when air dried to constant weight. Re
crystallization
from either MeOH or
EtOAc gave the product as a yellow solid, but
without any improvement in mp.
A
solution of 4.0 g of
1-(3,4-ethylenedioxyphenyl)-2-nitropropene was
made in 30 mL warm acetic acid. This was added to a suspension of 16
g elemental
electrolytic iron in 75 mL acetic acid. The mixture was
heated on the steam bath, and an exothermic reaction set in at about
70 °C. Heating was continued and the reaction allowed to proceed
until the mass was a thick gray color and a dirty scum had been formed
on the surface. After about 2 h, the entire mix was poured into 2 L
H2O and filtered free of a little
residual unreacted iron which was
washed with
CH2Cl2. The filtrate and washes were extracted with 3x100
mL
CH2Cl2 and the pooled organic extracts washed with 2x50 mL 5%
NaOH.
Removal of the
solvent gave 3.38 g of an amber oil which was
distilled. The product
1-(3,4-ethylenedioxyphenyl)-2-propanone
distilled as a white oil, at 105-110 °C at 0.2 mm/
Hg. It weighed 2.74
g.
To 2.0 g. of 1 inch squares of light-weight
aluminum foil there was
added a
solution of 50 mg
mercuric chloride in 70 mL water. After
standing at room tem
perature for 30 min, the H2O was drained away, and
the
amalgamated
aluminum washed twice with H2O, and shaken as dry as
possible. There was then added, promptly and in immediate sequence, a
solution of 3 g
methylamine hydrochloride in 3 mL H2O, 9 mL IPA, 7.25
mL 25%
NaOH, 2.70 g of
1-(3,4-ethylenedioxyphenyl)-2-propanone, and 18
mL IPA. The mixture was heated on the steam bath until an exothermic
reaction set in, and then it was continuously swirled as the reaction
proceeded. When the
aluminum was consumed, there was a colorless gray
sludge, and this was filtered and washed with 2x10 mL MeOH. The
combined mother liquors and washes were stripped of
solvent under
vacuum. The two
phase residue was suspended in 400 mL H2O containing
sufficient H2SO4 to make the resulting water
solution acidic to
pH
paper. This was washed with 3x50 mL
CH2Cl2, made basic with 25%
NaOH,
and the product extracted with 3x50 mL
CH2Cl2. The resulting 3.01 g
slightly amber residue oil was
distilled at 110-120 °C at 0.25 mm/
Hg
to give 2.53 g of a white oil, which did not appear to absorb
carbon
dioxide. This was
dissolved in 12 mL IPA, neutralized with 1 mL
concentrated HCl and diluted with
anhydrous Et2O to the point of
initial turbidity. There separated white
crystals of
3,4-
ethylenedioxy-N-
methylamphetamine hydrochloride (
MDMC) which
weighed, when air dried to constant weight, 2.53 g.
DOSAGE: 200 or more mg.
DURATION: 3 - 5 h.
QUALITATIVE COMMENTS: (with 150 mg) A flood of
paresthesia at the 30
minute point, and then nothing. There was the development of a plus
one-and-a half effect over the next hour with the tendency to drift
into a dozing state with hypnogogic imagery. There were colored
letters in the
periphery of my visual field. There was no appetite
loss nor was there any blood pressure rise. And no eye jiggle or
teeth clenching. I was out of the experience in 4 to 5 hours. A
repeat of this level a few days later gave a bare possible threshold
with no other effects.
(with 200 mg) There was something unmistakable at 45 minutes, with
hints of nystagmus. Possibly
MDMA-like, with no indicators of
anything
psychedelic. Subtle return to baseline, and there were no
after-effects.
(with 250 mg) Alert at 40 minutes, and to a clear ++ at an hour.
Slight something in the eye muscles. Dropping thirty minutes later,
and baseline at three hours.
(with 250 mg) I am at a bare threshold at best.
EXTENSIONS AND COMMENTARY: What a strange and completely
unsatisfactory compound! In the original run-up from low levels to
increasing higher levels, there never was a dosage that was a minus,
that had no effect. At every level, something was thought to be
there, usually at a level of a single plus or thereabouts. But with
different people, different responses. There is no way of guessing
what an active level might be, or how consistent that level might be
between different people, or for that matter what the responses are
that might be expected at that level.
This was yet one more effort to find an
MDMA-like
substitute by the
miniscule manipulation of the
MDMA molecule. Perhaps a small
molecular change might leave the particular magic of the
MDMA action
alone, but eliminate the
serotonin neuron problem in test animals.
Maybe the
serotonin neuron change is essential for
MDMA to have the
action it has. Who can tell?
The original name that this compound got, during the several
explorations of
MDMA analogues, was based on the nickname for MDMA
which was Adam. HAD'EM was mentioned with the hydroxy compound, M
ADAM
with the
6-methyl homologue, and
FLADAM with the 6-
fluoro analogue.
This compound got the sobriquet
MACADAM from that horrible black gooey
mess generated at the
aldehyde stage. This was shortened to RCS and
eventually the RCS was added to the
MDMA parent name. Thus,
MDMC. It
doesn't really make sense; EDMA is more reasonable. But then there is
no reason why
MDMC should make sense.
Back to PiHKAL?